He served for most of his career as professor of psychiatry at the State University of New York Upstate Medical University in Syracuse, New York. The psychiatry that Szasz railed against in his most famous book was full of myths and was mostly false. "Mental illnesses" are really problems in living. But Szasz was predated in this commitment to a humane approach to patients by the extensive existential tradition in psychiatry, inaugurated by Karl Jaspers in 1913 and extended in the 1930s and later by Viktor Frank and Ludwig Binswanger and Leston Havens, among others. The Existential-Humanist Perspective . . In the 1970s, Szasz was claimed by existentialist psychotherapists as a fellow traveller, if not a full member of the clan (Hoeller, 1997, 2012; Stadlen, 2014). Szasz seems to engage in what philosophers call eliminative materialism, which is the view that once we have sufficient scientific knowledge, the language of the ordinary world (folk psychology) will be replaced by a scientific language. The serotonin hypothesis of depression never was a legitimate scientific hypothesis that could be proven or disproven. Not content to leave matters there, Szasz goes on to say that Laing used involuntary hospitalization in the management of his first family, who returned to Glasgow after his divorce in 1964. As with those thought bad (insane people), and those who took the wrong drugs (drug addicts), medicine created a category for those who had the wrong weight (obesity). The state, searching for a way to exclude nonconformists and dissidents, legitimized psychiatry's coercive practices. For decades, Thomas Szasz has publicly challenged the excesses that obscure reason. In short, not one, but both of the tacit assumptions embedded in the term mental illness are tendentious, and at variance with one another. That's not what diseases are." Szasz is part of a larger postmodernist tradition, which one can accept or reject, but which is independent of him. Get the help you need from a therapist near youa FREE service from Psychology Today. Another personal aspect to Szasz life that is mentioned rarely is that his first wife likely had a psychiatric disease. Perhaps the most charitable thing one can say on behalf of Szaszs case against Laing is to render the old Scottish verdict: Not proven. Mental illness, he said, was only a metaphor that described problems that people faced in their daily lives, labeled as if they were medical diseases. Enfant terrible of psychiatry and widely known as one of its most indefatigable as well as iconoclastic critics, Thomas Szasz (1961-2012) had a prolific writing career that extended some 51. It currently publishes more than 6,000 new publications a year, has offices in around fifty countries, and employs more than 5,500 people worldwide. We now speak of having a drug-abuse problem. [25] The "nanny state" was punitive, austere, and authoritarian, the therapeutic state is touchy-feely, supportive and even more authoritarian. Psychiatry in the 1980s and 1990s was wrong again, but not in the same ways as in the 1960s. To argue the contrary is to assume, in effect, if not in quite so many words, that the client is always so deeply embroiled in conflict that he or she shares no common or important interests with his or her family, friends, employers, etc., or none deep or potent enough to mitigate the severity of the clients difficulty. But that is not the issue. Lithium is proven to prevent suicide based on double-blind placebo-controlled studies; it is the only drug proven to do so in our highest level of scientific research. Through his remaining friends and colleagues in Glasgow, Laing was still fairly current with the situation at Gartnavel, and probably knew or strongly suspected that the new brass would greet any of his overtures or representations on Fionas behalf with cold hostility. For some time now, Szasz has maintained that psychotherapy is an essentially ethical enterprise a secular cure of souls analogous, in some ways, to Catholic confession even though the analysts stance toward his patient/client, by Szaszs account, is more akin to the purely voluntary association between a Jewish rabbi and a fellow Jew than between a Catholic priest and his parishioner. This is the standard perspective of the anti-psychiatry movement, and Szasz participated in it, collaborating closely with Scientology-funded groups, and smiling broadly in pictures with the likes of Tom Cruise. This paper attempts to clarify Szasz's own political perspective. He is seen by his supporters, mostly citizens who are critical of the psychiatric system, as a courageous man who spoke out against the errors and excesses of his profession. Szasz's inconsistencies and nonsociological underpinnings lead to a clear political bias in his own work, as well as provide a rationale for regressive social policies. Moreover, and more importantly, in terms of general principles for clinical practice, it is quite possible to be compassionate and respectful toward the client, and to put their interests first, while still trying to be helpful to the clients significant others. Yet, they disagreed about the facts of mental illness. If we take the pertinent historical evidence into account, this statement probably represented a vote of non-confidence in Anne Laings ability to restore her daughters emotional equilibrium, rather than an endorsement of involuntary hospitalization per se. "Sheldon Richman, Editor, The Freeman, "It takes an iconoclast with temerity and acumen to illuminate how unexamined myths and metaphors insidiously determine prevailing normsnorms considered unassailable and sacrosanct by the established medical/legal system. Instead, I would be inclined to say that the story of Thomas Szasz cant be understood outside of the context of how psychiatry evolved in the course of his career. By definition, the malingerer is knowingly deceitful (although malingering itself has also been called a mental illness or disorder). Szasz lives in an imaginary world where one and the same ethical principle the right to suicide, or to absolute confidentiality in all imaginable circumstances applies equally to all people, regardless of age, background and condition. Some things are more precious than the therapeutic alliance. He accepted the existence of medical disease; he just denied such status to psychiatric diagnoses. Nassir Ghaemi, M.D., M.P.H., is Professor of Psychiatry at Tufts University and Lecturer in Psychiatry at Harvard Medical School. Does this mean that the therapist is the expert on ethics, and therefore in a position to prescribe or legislate for the patient how he or she should live? What Happens When You Mention Suicide in Therapy? On reflection, there is probably no more potent method for silencing dissatisfaction, dissent and the sense of having been violated or misunderstood than by treating (inner or interpersonal) conflict per se as symptomatic of mental illness. He was concerned that the stigma and social rejection associated with psychiatric treatment might harm people. He criticized the war on drugs, arguing that using drugs is in fact a victimless crime. Psychiatry in the 1950s and 1960s was unhumanistic, and repressive in many ways, and it remains so to some extent today. The most famous proponent of this view was undoubtedly the late Dr. Thomas Szasz. Set against our anxiety-avoidant times, life-enhancing anxiety enables us to live with and make the best of the depth and mystery of existence.. In framing my objections to Szaszs attack this way, I hoped that a lucid and fair-minded acknowledgement of the pertinent historical and contextual data would help to make my case. . When you take these mundane matters into account, Szaszs lofty appeal to principles, and his claim that Laing approved of involuntary hospitalization seems opportunistic or obtuse, to say the least. Existential Analysis is a Journal of note in its specialist field and is known worldwide by those interested in reflecting on existential Thomas Szasz is professor emeritus of psychiatry at the State University of New York Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, New York. The figure of the psychotic or schizophrenic person to psychiatric experts and authorities, according to Szasz, is analogous with the figure of the heretic or blasphemer to theological experts and authorities. Title: The handbook of humanistic psychology : theory, research, and practice / edited by Kirk J. Schneider, J. Fraser Pierson, James F.T. Thomas Szasz has attempted to "repoliticize psychiatry" by specifying the values which are obscured by a medical or psychiatric vocabulary. Therapists must wrestle with the same ethical questions their clients face, but also call attention to those they avoid facing. As has been evaluated in a previous paper, Thomas S. Szasz redoubled his attacks against R. D. Laing in a series of articles which were published in The New Review (TNR) during the 1970s. Only an insane person would do such a thing to his widow and children, it was successfully argued. Finally, imagine that when you consider your colleagues behavior toward his first family, you hold him at least partially responsible for creating the familial instability that led to his childs breakdown, which resulted, eventually, in (his or her) hospitalization. In truth, mental illness is not a myth, but an oxymoron. Meanwhile, framing the whole issue in such starkly adversarial terms, as Szasz does, is quite revealing, and there are many reasonable people who would shun the services of a mental health professional whose ostensible zeal on behalf of the clients interests pits them in adversarial struggle with others from the outset, as a matter of course. While Dennis O'Neil (creator of the former's name, albeit not the character proper, who was originally named Vic Sage) is not known to have elaborated on his inspiration, Alan Grant (creator of the latter) recounted having seen the name at a library. . A collection of essays by one of the most influential and original thinkers of our generation. Mania wasnt a reaction to depression, as they argued. Disorder of Openness: Authoritarian Personality Disorder aka OCPD. Or a cardiologist who claims that there is no heart disease. Freud suggested that a detached expert who excises or replaces morbid tissue from the unconscious corpus of his patient represents the model for the listening and interpretive skills of someone charged with making the unconscious conscious. We offer existential therapy certification and our yearly existential therapy training retreat for clinicians teaches E-H therapy skills to enhance therapeutic practice. Szasz maintained throughout his career that he was not anti-psychiatry but rather that he opposed coercive psychiatry. Kendell's arguments include the following: Shorter[39] replied to Szasz's essay "The myth of mental illness: 50 years later",[40] which was published in the journal The Psychiatrist (and delivered as a plenary address at the International Congress of the Royal College of Psychiatrists in Edinburgh on 24 June 2010) in recognition of the 50th anniversary of The Myth of Mental Illness with the following principal criticisms: Szasz was honored with over fifty awards including:[3]. Thomas Stephen Szasz ( / ss / SAHSS; Hungarian: Szsz Tams Istvn [sas]; 15 April 1920 - 8 September 2012) was a Hungarian-American academic and psychiatrist. So these remarks, striking as they are, do not reflect his professional activities at the time. He served for most of his career as professor of psychiatry at the State University of New York Upstate Medical University in Syracuse, New York. One of the most respected and widely read professional journals in today's social sciences, Social Problems presents accessible, relevant, and innovative articles that maintain critical perspectives of the highest quality. [23][24]:17 Thus suicide, unconventional religious beliefs, racial bigotry, unhappiness, anxiety, shyness, sexual promiscuity, shoplifting, gambling, overeating, smoking, and illegal drug use are all considered symptoms or illnesses that need to be cured. And he probably reckoned correctly, I think that if Fiona were released from Gartnavel, it would be into her mothers custody, not his. He has writ- ten extensively on many subjects including the history of medicine and the symbolic nature of communication. In his IFPE address of November 2, 2002, Szasz stated: Psychoanalysis possesses a valuable moral core that has never been properly identified and is now virtually unrecognized: it is, or ought to be, a wholly voluntary and reliably confidential human service, initiated and controlled largely by the client who pays for it (p.2). To keep this ethical relationship intact, says Szasz, the practitioner must confine his or her role to conversing with the client in the privacy of a professional office, and to completely refrain from meddling in their life outside it. Diseases are "malfunctions of the human body, of the heart, the liver, the kidney, the brain" while "no behavior or misbehavior is a disease or can be a disease. (Pies trained under Szasz but developed an independent critical position of Szasz' views, while holding him in esteem personally). For example, Constance T. Fischer, professor of psychology at Duquesne University, introduces the 2002 special double issue of The Humanistic Psychologist with this sentence: In this collection of articles, psychologists approaches to assessment are compassionate, caring, deeply respectful of the humanity of the clients, and courageous in efforts to be genuinely helpful to all parties (Fischer, 2002, p.1, emphasis in the original). [the one] who first seizes the word imposes reality on the other; [the one] who defines thus dominates and lives; and [the one] who is defined is subjugated and may be killed. He was a staunch opponent of civil commitment and involuntary psychiatric treatment, but he believed in and practiced psychiatry and psychotherapy between consenting adults. Robert Evan Kendell presents (in Schaler, 2005[38]) a critique of Szasz's conception of disease and the contention that mental illness is "mythical" as presented in The Myth of Mental Illness. These two cases, different as they are, are relatively clear cut, while many others we could mention occupy an intermediate position, and are anything but clear. morphological abnormality, is arbitrary and his conclusions based on this idea represent, Szasz's criticism of syndrome-based diagnoses is divorced from a consideration of the, Szasz's contention that mental illness is not associated with any morphological abnormality is uninformed by genetics, biochemistry, and current research results on the, Szasz contends that, "Strictly speaking, disease or illness can affect only the body; hence, there can be no mental illness" and this idea is foundational to Szasz's position. a so-called mental patients true (mentally healthy) interests cannot conflict with the interests of his loved ones or those of his community. [4] A distinguished lifetime fellow of the American Psychiatric Association and a life member of the American Psychoanalytic Association, he was best known as a social critic of the moral and scientific foundations of psychiatry, as what he saw as the social control aims of medicine in modern society, as well as scientism. . In a 2009 interview aired by the Australian Broadcasting Corporation, Szasz explained his reason for collaborating with CCHR and lack of involvement with Scientology: Well I got affiliated with an organisation long after I was established as a critic of psychiatry, called Citizens Commission for Human Rights, because they were then the only organisation and they still are the only organisation who had money and had some access to lawyers and were active in trying to free mental patients who were incarcerated in mental hospitals with whom there was nothing wrong, who had committed no crimes, who wanted to get out of the hospital. Take the subject of suicide. Why? Theres no such thing as psychiatric disease even in such cases. To Szasz, disease can only mean something people "have", while behavior is what people "do". A constitutional monarch plays the psychological role of a parent figure in a democratic society. But before outlining my various misgivings, please note that I share Szaszs contempt for the vulgar misconception that . Medicalized psychoanalysis (psychotherapy) denies the quintessential intimacy of its own distinctive method, illustrated by the obtuse conception that it is something the therapist gives or does to the patient, as if it were a surgical operation. The good that men do may be interred with their bones, as Shakespeare's Marc Antony famously intoned over Caesar, but it also is true that the evil men do lives after them. Though I am not the first to say so, of course, the phrase mental illness is actually thundering contradiction in terms, which perpetuates and inscribes the Cartesian mind/body dualism in the discourse of the mental health professions. For more than half a century, Thomas Szasz has devoted much of his career to a radical critique of psychiatry. Sociologically, he saw psychiatry as a state-sanctioned mechanism of social control and an omnipotent threat to civil. He had previously suffered a fall and would have had to live in chronic pain otherwise. Their opinions truly were myths. [11]:22. But the full meaning of this statement only becomes clear when it is juxtaposed with a subsequent (and equally emphatic) statement to the effect that many sane people, who are deemed competent by their peers (and prevailing community standards) pose a much greater threat to the safety and well-being of others than the average mental patient. He was 30 or 31 years old at the time, and not obliged indeed, not even allowed to treat certifiable patients in the course of his clinical duties. This would be the viewpoint of todays apologists for psychiatry. So if we accept that mental illnesses are social constructions, as Foucault and Szasz argue, then the psychiatric profession is a mere rationale for enforcement of societys standards. because the greatest obstacle to success may be success. Insofar as Thomas Szasz describes himself as a libertarian (), a conservative, and a Republican, one would naturally expect to find among his philosophical influences: defenders of individual freedom such as Jean-Jacques Rousseau, conservative theorists such as Edmund Burke, libertarian theorists such as Friedrich A. Hayek (Vatz and Weinberg, 1983, pp. Laing, however, consciously decided not reply to Szasz, a task taken up instead by Leon Redler on behalf of the Philadelphia Association (PA). Sociologist Erving Goffman, who wrote Asylums: Essays on the Condition of the Social Situation of Mental Patients and Other Inmates, was skeptical about psychiatric practices.
Liverpool City Council General Manager,
All You Can Eat Crab Legs Daytona Beach Shores,
Appalachian Trail Murders I Survived,
Louis Angelos Baltimore Orioles,
Articles T
